Conventional vs. Digital Dental Impression

نویسندگان

چکیده

Dental impressions are an important part of routine diagnostic and therapeutic dental procedures. Using conventional impression materials, the dentist captures intraoral details, technician uses for casts pouring. Intraoral scanners (IOS) fast, accurate more pleasant a patient than techniques became valid alternative to those Thirty-four students performed alginate digital on each other filled two two-part questionnaires reveal their preferences expectations from both techniques. The results showed statistically significant difference in time needed impressions, with being faster. From patient's perspective, scan was impression. majority participants thought would completely replace during lifetime find it necessary implement new technologies schools' curricula.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Implant Impression Approach: A Three-Dimensional Comparative In Vitro Analysis.

PURPOSE To assess the three-dimensional (3D) accuracy and clinical acceptability of implant definitive casts fabricated using a digital impression approach and to compare the results with those of a conventional impression method in a partially edentulous condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS A mandibular reference model was fabricated with implants in the first premolar and molar positions to sim...

متن کامل

In vivo evaluation of inter-operator reproducibility of digital dental and conventional impression techniques

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the inter-operator reproducibility of three-dimensional (3D) images of teeth captured by a digital impression technique to a conventional impression technique in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve participants with complete natural dentition were included in this study. A digital impression of the mandibular molars of these participant...

متن کامل

Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE To compare digital and conventional impression techniques in a randomized clinical trial; specifically, procedure times, patient-centered outcomes, and clinical evaluation of the restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-two patients in need of tooth-supported single crowns and/or fixed partial prostheses up to six units were randomly allocated to one of the impression techniques. The...

متن کامل

Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficiency, difficulty and operator's preference of a digital impression compared with a conventional impression for single implant restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty HSDM second year dental students performed conventional and digital implant impressions on a customized model presenting a single implant. The outcome of the imp...

متن کامل

Changes in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression taking

BACKGROUNDS Despite the rapid development of digital dentistry, the use of digital intraoral scanners remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in views on intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training. METHODS Thirty-four dental hygienists with >3 years of clinical experience participated and were divided into 2 groups : iTero and Trios groups. Participan...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: International journal of reliable and quality e-healthcare

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2160-956X', '2160-9551']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijrqeh.298631